Can Your Architecture Repository Keep Conflicting Evidence? A PPMN 1.0 Test
OMG PPMN 1.0 provides a formal provenance model. Use a disputed application retirement to test whether an EA repository preserves claims, evidence and assessment.
In this analysis
- The boundary that makes the standard useful
- Run a disputed-retirement exercise
- Inspect what the dashboard leaves out
- Keep conformance separate from buyer acceptance
- Decide who can accept a fact
Build your EA platform evaluation criteria
Related analysis
- Information Mapping: The Data Backbone Your EA Tool Must Support
- BACM 1.1 Is Formal. Now Ask What Your Architecture Tool Can Exchange
- The EA Tool Evaluation Scorecard: A Weighted Framework You Can Defend
PPMN 1.0: Test Evidence Provenance in Your EA Repository — Vantograph